Picture: This picture is of the endangered species the bowhead whale, whose low population could be affected by the drilling
Summary: Basically this article is about the U.S. federal officials giving Shell the chance to keep drilling for oil, but now in the Arctic. Not long ago the United Nations released a report saying that Shell has contributed to 50 years of pollution in the Niger Delta. As of now Shell is beginning a ver expensive and extensive cleanup in one country, and with the start drilling is racing to put one of the most pristine and remote places on earth at risk. A lot of major energy companies have been coveting the Arctic for years, but conservation groups have been arguing that we need a better understanding of the Arctic ecosystem. Where should be drilling there are endangered species and many other species that could be affected from irresponsible drilling. Shell also does not have an adequate oil spill cleanup plan fo the Arctic, and the Arctic;s ice waters would be much more difficult to clean up than those in warmer climates. Canadian researchers have found that "conditions in the Arctic can be so bad that clean up measures in the Arctic are not even possible about 20% if the time in June;40% of the time in August and 65% of the time in October. The company says it will take full responsibility for any cleanup necessary, but in the previous Nigerian oil spill Shell said that 15 site were remediated, but 10 of the had pollution levels exceeding government standards. Although Shell got the green light from the Interior Department they still have much to do before they can begin drilling
Reflection: I think that although it may be good for the economy in the beginning of this drilling, if anything goes wrong the costs of the cleanup would overcome the amount made from the drilling. Also, there is alot more we need to know about the ecosystem, there are many species that could be affected just from one oil spill. Also there is alot of talk about Shell's past and not alot of it is positive. I do not think it would be a good idea to let Shell drill in the Arctic.
Question 1: Do you think that drilling in this area has been brought up enough as it should be?
Question2: Do you think enough precautions are being taken for drilling in the Arctic?
Question 3: If you were an official would you let Shell drill in such a prestine place?